-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove all waitForTimeout
usage from the annotation integration tests
#17969
Remove all waitForTimeout
usage from the annotation integration tests
#17969
Conversation
/botio integrationtest |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)ReceivedCommand cmd_integrationtest from @timvandermeij received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.241.84.105:8877/61a3b3336ed5456/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Windows)ReceivedCommand cmd_integrationtest from @timvandermeij received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.193.163.58:8877/14e6fef0ac4728e/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)SuccessFull output at http://54.241.84.105:8877/61a3b3336ed5456/output.txt Total script time: 9.97 mins
|
From: Bot.io (Windows)SuccessFull output at http://54.193.163.58:8877/14e6fef0ac4728e/output.txt Total script time: 17.37 mins
|
(I'm deferring to @calixteman on this.) |
This commit replaces all `waitForTimeout` occurrences with the appropriate `waitForFunction` calls. Note that in some places they were already present, so in those cases we could simply remove the `waitForTimeout` call altogether.
53769f9
to
10641d5
Compare
waitForTimeout
usage from the annotation integration testswaitForTimeout
usage from the annotation integration tests
I have only rebased the patch and updated the commit message since the last run; no other (functional) changes have been made. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thank you for doing this.
This commit replaces all
waitForTimeout
occurrences with the appropriatewaitForFunction
calls. Note that in some places they were already present, so in those cases we could simply remove thewaitForTimeout
call altogether.Fixes a part of #17656.