-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 851
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make the $262 object available within the test262 tests #1229
Make the $262 object available within the test262 tests #1229
Conversation
Added this PR quickly as it might come in handly for #1227 |
Fix $262 object
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
this.scope = scope; | ||
|
||
scope.put("$262", scope, this); | ||
scope.setAttributes("$262", ScriptableObject.DONTENUM); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the scope setup should be done in the setup and mot in the ctor.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With setup
you mean moving the code into the .buildScope() method?
That would entail duplicating the code between there and the $262.createRealm method, which i don't really like either
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, is see, my problem was as i saw this line
new $262(scope);
i was really confused because i did not expect that this ctor call does some kind of registration in the scope. So from the first look this line looks really useless.
Maybe a factory method that has a hint in the name about the registration?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about now?
Any idea why there is no real effect? |
Btw. i think this is again great step forward for Rhino - THANKS. |
There is an effect now no? Some previously failing tests are now passing. I guess you mean why aren't more of the tests that depended on cross-realm passing now? Can't recall, but when I looked into it a while ago, they were failing due to other reasons. I filled for example #1079, because that is an EcmaScript incompatibility when using Symbols cross-realm |
This PR also needs a squash merge.... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@rbri great, tnx for the review. Can you squash-merge this PR? |
Yes I can :-) |
Closes #1077
PR not yet complete: needs at least the test262.properties file regenerated