Topology - use of \MPI process where necessary

[cniethammer]

Problem

Address use of \MPI process(es) where necessary in the topology chapter

Proposal and text changes

See https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/764

Impact on Implementations

None

Impact on Users

Clarification

References and Pull Requests

https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/764

[wesbland]

The scope of the change here makes me a little uncomfortable calling it a CC change. I'd definitely want @schulzm and @wgropp to give it a 👍 first.

[cniethammer]

pdf version: mpi41-report-issue-649-pr-764.pdf
pdf version with highlighted chanches: mpi41-report-diff-issue-649-pr-764.pdf

[RolfRabenseifner]

The issues 649, 650 and 651 are prepared by Christoph and they had an official reading at the December 2022 meeting.
I would prefere to handle them through chpater committee vote because the forum had already seen them and the type of content does not require full forum voting. Therefore:

@ chapter committee: @GuillaumeMercier @cblaas @htorst @tonyskjellum, @ Mahdieh Ghazimirsaeed, @cniethammer :
Please reply whether you approve this issue (yes/no/abstain).

[GuillaumeMercier]

The issues 649, 650 and 651 are prepared by Christoph and they had an official reading at the December 2022 meeting.

@RolfRabenseifner : you mean the PRs, not the issues, right?
I'm ok with the PR that fixes issue #649.