Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

0.8.2 does not respect --mf-fps on JPEGs #1689

Closed
Hello71 opened this issue Mar 15, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

0.8.2 does not respect --mf-fps on JPEGs #1689

Hello71 opened this issue Mar 15, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@Hello71
Copy link
Contributor

Hello71 commented Mar 15, 2015 

[15:58:26] < Hello71> before 0.8, I used to use mpv --mf-fps=x *.jpg *.png to make a simple slideshow. now, mpv does not honor the fps for jpeg files. how do I set that in 0.8?
[16:00:18] < wm4> Hello71: post a log with -v
[16:00:41] < wm4> Hello71: when playing a jpg file
[16:06:52] < Hello71> wm4: https://bpaste.net/show/1d46339bb1ef
[16:07:15] < wm4> aha
[16:08:36] < wm4> weird
[16:10:47] < wm4> maybe it's specifically broken in the 0.8 releases, but not mpv master
[16:11:43] < wm4> Hello71: can you open an issue in github?
[16:11:55] < wm4> I'll take a look tomorrow
[16:13:25] < Hello71> 0.8.0 works fine, but 0.8.2 doesn't
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2015
demux_lavf: fix rejection of image2 demuxer
8932d90 
This was probably broken for some time in git master, and the later
commit which happened to fix it was not picked.

Fixes #1689.
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 16, 2015

The fix will be in 0.8.3. @Kovensky: do you plan to release it soon? You already pushed release notes (I just added my fixup commit after it).

@Jessidhia
Copy link
Member

Just released it.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Mar 17, 2015
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Jessidhia @Hello71