Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[babel] Do not use experimental ES7 features #1844

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[babel] Do not use experimental ES7 features #1844

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member

I think that it's safer like this. Beside, as far as I have see, we are not using stage 1 features.

@shaurya947
Copy link
Contributor

@oliviertassinari you mean in the MUI source? Yeah I don't think we currently use stage 1 features in the source.. although ThemeDecorator is used externally with an ES7 decorator.

Thoughts @hai-cea ?

@oliviertassinari
Copy link
Member Author

you mean in the MUI source

Yes.

ThemeDecorator is used externally with an ES7 decorator.

Yes, but this is not affecting the source code of MUI.

@oliviertassinari oliviertassinari deleted the patch-11 branch November 3, 2015 10:51
mnajdova pushed a commit to mnajdova/material-ui that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2020
Bumps [ts-loader](https://github.com/TypeStrong/ts-loader) from 6.2.2 to 7.0.5.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/TypeStrong/ts-loader/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/TypeStrong/ts-loader/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](TypeStrong/ts-loader@v6.2.2...v7.0.5)

Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <support@dependabot.com>

Co-authored-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <27856297+dependabot-preview[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@zannager zannager added the package: system Specific to @mui/system label Mar 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
package: system Specific to @mui/system
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants