-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v5.0.0-beta.1 #27230
v5.0.0-beta.1 #27230
Conversation
@eps1lon Are you OK with the version change for the private packages? I wasn't too sure that it would be better, it seemed simpler though. |
ea6adb4
to
bf4ca6c
Compare
Co-authored-by: Siriwat K <siriwatkunaporn@gmail.com>
@oliviertassinari Did you run |
@eps1lon I have used |
Well you made a mistake when manually editing the versions since you forgot to bump |
Thanks for raising. I think that I forgot to rerun the package version script after I rebased the branch to take in the changes between Monday and Wednesday. |
I have updated the version of the private packages to a pinned:
5.0.0
. The objective is so we can keep it the same going forward, avoiding diffs/noise in the release PRs. Private packages are never released, the version is useless from what I understand. We already use this tradeoff in the examples.Important, a preview of how the header of the release looks and feels like:
As a side thought: We had 13 contributors in 10 days, the community has been quiet in the last few days. It seems that the pattern is older than this. We might want to spend more time on the issues and PRs, and less time on the ongoing initiatives. We were often at 20 contributors/week in the past, I was dedicating 80% of my time to issues and PRs, not initiatives. 80% was probably too much, I guess we need to find a balance and a reasonable target, it's a tension: