Add a test case checking context precedence #31
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cjerdonek
added a commit
to cjerdonek/mustache-spec
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2012
… development See issue mustache#31: mustache#31
pombredanne
pushed a commit
to pombredanne/pystache
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2013
The two test cases test, respectively, (1) context precedence and (2) that section output not be rendered. The two test cases were originally proposed for inclusion in the Mustache spec test cases in mustache/spec issues defunkt#31 and defunkt#32: * mustache/spec#31 * mustache/spec#32
Merged
|
Will be merged as #114, thank you for your contribution and sorry it took 9! years. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It doesn't look like the spec includes a test case checking that items higher in the context stack should take precedence -- especially a test case checking this in isolation. Here is one.