feat: enhance path drawing with flexible handling and live updates #1
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request enhance the drawing application's functionality by integrating a Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
src/utils/constants.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM! Consider documenting the default thickness choice.The addition of
defaultPathThicknessaligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing path drawing functionality. This constant will provide a consistent default value across the application.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the rationale behind choosing 25 as the default thickness. Alternatively, if this value might need adjustment in the future, you could consider making it configurable through an environment variable or a settings file.
src/interfaces/index.ts (2)
30-31: LGTM: New properties for path thickness management.The additions of
pathThicknessandsetPathThicknessto theSidebarPropsinterface are well-defined and align with the PR objectives. They provide the necessary functionality for managing path thickness from the sidebar.For consistency with other properties in the interface, consider using a more specific name for
pathThickness, such ascurrentPathThicknessorselectedPathThickness.
Canvas component is missing or not utilizing
pathThickness.
- The
src/components/Canvas.tsxfile does not exist, which is expected to utilize the newpathThicknessproperty.- Ensure that the
Canvascomponent is implemented and correctly integrates thepathThicknessproperty to fully support the path thickness feature.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-31: Summary: Interfaces updated to support path thickness feature.The changes to both
ShapeandSidebarPropsinterfaces provide a solid foundation for implementing the new path thickness feature. These modifications align well with the PR objectives and enhance the application's drawing capabilities.To ensure full implementation:
- Verify that the
Canvascomponent utilizes these new properties.- Confirm that the
Sidebarcomponent correctly implements the newpathThicknessandsetPathThicknessprops.- Check that the drawing logic in relevant components (e.g.,
ThreeJSViewer) incorporates the newthicknessproperty when rendering shapes.To verify the implementation, run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new thickness-related properties and methods # Test 1: Check Canvas component for pathThickness usage echo "Checking Canvas component for pathThickness usage:" rg --type typescript 'pathThickness' src/components/Canvas.tsx # Test 2: Verify Sidebar component implementation echo "Verifying Sidebar component implementation:" rg --type typescript 'pathThickness|setPathThickness' src/components/Sidebar.tsx # Test 3: Check drawing logic in ThreeJSViewer echo "Checking ThreeJSViewer for thickness property usage:" rg --type typescript 'thickness' src/components/ThreeJSViewer.tsxLength of output: 639
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new thickness-related properties and methods # Test 1: Check Canvas component for pathThickness usage echo "Checking Canvas component for pathThickness usage:" rg --type ts 'pathThickness' src/components/Canvas.tsx # Test 2: Verify Sidebar component implementation echo "Verifying Sidebar component implementation:" rg --type ts 'pathThickness|setPathThickness' src/components/Sidebar.tsx # Test 3: Check drawing logic in ThreeJSViewer echo "Checking ThreeJSViewer for thickness property usage:" rg --type ts 'thickness' src/components/ThreeJSViewer.tsxLength of output: 952
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate Canvas component and verify pathThickness usage # Search for all Canvas.tsx files in the repository echo "Searching for Canvas.tsx files in the repository:" fd 'Canvas\.tsx$' src/ --type file # If Canvas.tsx files are found, check for pathThickness usage if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Verifying pathThickness usage in each Canvas.tsx file:" fd 'Canvas\.tsx$' src/ --type file | while read -r file; do echo "Checking $file for pathThickness usage:" rg 'pathThickness' "$file" done else echo "No Canvas.tsx files found in the repository." fiLength of output: 334
src/utils/exportimport.ts (1)
Line range hint
70-95: Consider updatingimportShapesto handle the newthicknessproperty.While the
exportShapesfunction has been updated to include thethicknessproperty, theimportShapesfunction remains unchanged. To ensure consistency, consider updatingimportShapesto properly handle thethicknessproperty when creating imported shapes.Here's a suggested modification to the
createShapecall withinimportShapes:importedShapes.forEach(shapeProps => { - createShape(shapeProps) + createShape({ + ...shapeProps, + thickness: shapeProps.thickness || defaultPathThickness + }) })This change ensures that imported shapes will have a
thicknessproperty, defaulting todefaultPathThicknessif not present in the imported data.src/components/Sidebar.tsx (3)
22-26: Approve with suggestion: Consider using Number.isNaN for stricter equality.The
setThicknessfunction correctly handles invalid inputs and sets a default thickness when needed. However, there's a minor improvement we can make:Consider replacing
isNaN(thickness)withNumber.isNaN(thickness)for a stricter equality check. This avoids potential type coercion issues. Here's the suggested change:const setThickness = (thickness: number) => { - if (thickness < 1 || isNaN(thickness)) thickness = defaultPathThickness + if (thickness < 1 || Number.isNaN(thickness)) thickness = defaultPathThickness setPathThickness(thickness) }This change aligns with best practices for handling NaN checks in TypeScript/JavaScript.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 23-23: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
45-56: Approve with suggestion: Consider adding min and max attributes to the input.The new UI elements for path thickness are well-implemented and correctly integrated into the existing component. The conditional rendering ensures the input is only shown for relevant shape types.
To enhance user experience and prevent potential issues, consider adding
minandmaxattributes to the number input. This will provide built-in validation and improve usability. Here's a suggested modification:<input type='number' value={pathThickness} onChange={e => setThickness(Number(e.target.value))} className='p-2 border border-gray-200 rounded-md focus:outline-none focus:shadow-outline w-32' placeholder='Path thickness' + min="1" + max="100" />Adjust the
maxvalue as appropriate for your application's needs.
Line range hint
1-108: Overall assessment: Well-implemented feature with minor suggestions for improvement.The changes to the Sidebar component successfully implement the new path thickness functionality as described in the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, readable, and maintains consistency with the existing codebase. The new feature is appropriately integrated, with conditional rendering and proper state management.
Key points:
- The import statements are correctly updated.
- New props are added to support the thickness feature.
- A new
setThicknessfunction handles input validation.- UI elements for thickness control are conditionally rendered.
The suggestions provided in previous comments (using
Number.isNaNand addingmin/maxattributes) are minor improvements that would further enhance the code quality and user experience.Consider extracting the thickness input into a separate component if you plan to reuse it elsewhere in the application. This would improve modularity and make it easier to maintain and test the thickness functionality independently.
src/components/ThreeJSViewer.tsx (2)
53-54: LGTM: Flexible thickness calculationThe implementation of the
thicknessvariable allows for flexible handling of path thickness, which aligns well with the PR objectives. The use of optional chaining and nullish coalescing operators is a modern and safe approach.Consider improving readability by breaking the thickness calculation into multiple lines:
const thickness = shape?.thickness ?? shape?.instance?._strokeStyle?.width ?? defaultPathThickness;This multi-line format might be easier to read and maintain, especially if more fallback options are added in the future.
81-81: LGTM: Dynamic thickness for line and path geometriesThe use of the
thicknessvariable in theTubeGeometryconstructor for both 'line' and 'path' shapes allows for dynamic thickness, which aligns well with the PR objectives. This implementation improves flexibility and maintainability by removing hardcoded values.For consistency, consider extracting the common
TubeGeometryparameters into a constant or a function. This could help maintain consistency across different shape types and make future updates easier. For example:const createTubeGeometry = (curve: THREE.Curve<THREE.Vector3>) => new THREE.TubeGeometry(curve, 64, thickness, 8, false); // Then use it like this: geometry = createTubeGeometry(lineCurve); // for 'line' geometry = createTubeGeometry(curve); // for 'path'This refactoring would ensure that any future changes to the
TubeGeometryparameters are applied consistently to both 'line' and 'path' shapes.Also applies to: 90-90
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- src/App.tsx (11 hunks)
- src/components/Sidebar.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/ThreeJSViewer.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/interfaces/index.ts (2 hunks)
- src/utils/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/exportimport.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/components/Sidebar.tsx
[error] 23-23: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
src/interfaces/index.ts (1)
19-19: LGTM: Addition ofthicknessproperty enhances shape customization.The new optional
thicknessproperty in theShapeinterface aligns well with the PR objectives. It provides the necessary flexibility for path drawing enhancements while maintaining backward compatibility.src/utils/exportimport.ts (3)
2-2: LGTM: Import ofdefaultPathThicknessadded.The addition of this import is consistent with the new thickness property being introduced for shapes. It provides a default value to use when a shape's thickness is not specified.
18-18: Approve changes togetUpdatedShapeData, but verify path coordinate reset.The addition of the
thicknessproperty and its handling for bothlineandpathcases is well-implemented. However, the resetting of x and y coordinates for paths to 0 (lines 34-35) might affect the positioning of imported shapes.Please verify that resetting path coordinates to 0 doesn't negatively impact the positioning of imported shapes. You can run the following script to check for any other occurrences of path coordinate handling:
Also applies to: 28-30, 34-37
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Path coordinate reset does not impact other components.
The search revealed that resetting path coordinates to 0 in
exportimport.tsdoes not affect other parts of the codebase. The only related occurrence inThreeJSViewer.tsxhandles coordinate conversion differently and is unaffected by this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of path coordinate handling # Search for path-related code rg --type typescript -i 'path.*coord|coord.*path'Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of path coordinate handling # Search for path-related code in TypeScript files rg --type ts -i 'path.*coord|coord.*path'Length of output: 170
54-54: Verify impact of simplifiedactiveShapesfiltering.The filtering logic for
activeShapeshas been simplified. While this change allows for the inclusion of shapes without an instance (as long as they're not deleted), it might lead to unexpected behavior if there are shapes in the array that don't have an instance for other reasons.Please verify that this change doesn't inadvertently include shapes that should be excluded from the export. Run the following script to check for any shapes without instances in the codebase:
src/components/Sidebar.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The addition of
defaultPathThicknessto the import statement is consistent with the new thickness feature implementation.
15-16: LGTM: New props added for path thickness functionality.The addition of
pathThicknessandsetPathThicknessprops is appropriate for implementing the new thickness feature in the Sidebar component.src/components/ThreeJSViewer.tsx (2)
5-5: LGTM: New import for default path thicknessThe addition of
defaultPathThicknessimport is a good practice. It provides a fallback value for path thickness, which aligns with the PR's objective of enhancing path drawing with flexible handling.
Line range hint
1-134: Overall assessment: Well-implemented enhancements to path drawingThe changes in this file successfully implement the PR objectives of enhancing path drawing with flexible handling. The introduction of dynamic thickness for paths and lines, along with the use of a default thickness constant, improves the flexibility and maintainability of the code.
The implementation makes good use of modern JavaScript features like optional chaining and nullish coalescing, which contributes to safer and more readable code.
While the current implementation is solid, the suggested minor improvements (multi-line formatting for readability and extracting common
TubeGeometryparameters) could further enhance the code's maintainability and consistency.Great job on these enhancements!
src/App.tsx (11)
8-8: LGTM!Importing
defaultPathThicknessandShapeTypefrom./utils/constantsis appropriate.
14-14: Initializing pathThickness with useStateUsing
useStateto managepathThicknesswithdefaultPathThicknessis appropriate and allows for dynamic updates.
27-27: Using useRef for pathPointsRefGood use of
useRefto managepathPointsRef, optimizing performance by avoiding unnecessary re-renders associated with state updates.
51-51: Setting stroke style with thicknessCorrectly setting the stroke style using
props?.thickness ?? pathThicknessensures that the shape uses the specified thickness or falls back to the default.
57-57: Consistent stroke style in 'path' shapesApplying stroke style with
props?.thickness ?? pathThicknessin 'path' shapes maintains consistency across different shape types.
105-105: Updating stroke style during draggingAppropriately updating the stroke style during shape dragging ensures visual consistency as shapes are moved.
191-195: Verify path drawing logicEnsure that the path drawing logic correctly includes the starting point when
pathPointsRef.currentis not empty. There may be a potential issue where the initialmoveTocommand is omitted, which could result in the path not starting from the correct point.Also applies to: 197-197
384-390: Confirm setting x and y to 0 for path shapesWhen finalizing the path,
xandyare set to0in the shape properties. Verify that this is intentional and that the path's position is accurately represented, especially if the path points are using absolute coordinates.
391-391: Ensure correct assignment of the instance propertyAssigning the
instanceproperty usingstageRef.current?.children[stageRef.current?.children.length - 1]assumes that the last child is the current shape. Confirm that this reliably references the intended shape, as other shapes might have been added to the stage, which could lead to referencing the wrong shape.
432-433: Passing pathThickness and setPathThickness to SidebarPassing
pathThicknessandsetPathThicknessto theSidebarcomponent allows users to adjust the thickness of paths dynamically, enhancing the application's interactivity.
11-11: Ensure 'lodash' dependency is includedSince
isEmptyfrom 'lodash' is being used, make sure that 'lodash' is included in your project's dependencies inpackage.json.You can run the following script to check:
✅ Verification successful
'lodash' is correctly included in the project's dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'lodash' is listed in package.json dependencies. # Test: Check if 'lodash' is in the dependencies object of package.json. jq '.dependencies | has("lodash")' package.jsonLength of output: 54
src/App.tsx
Outdated
| @@ -49,12 +48,13 @@ const Canvas: React.FC = () => { | |||
| if (props.endX === undefined || props.endY === undefined) return | |||
|
|
|||
| g.beginStroke(props.strokeColor) | |||
| .setStrokeStyle(props?.thickness ?? pathThickness) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated stroke style setting
The code setting stroke style with props?.thickness ?? pathThickness is repeated in multiple places. Consider creating a helper function to adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.
Here's how you might refactor:
+const getStrokeThickness = (props: ShapeInterface) => props?.thickness ?? pathThickness;
// Replace occurrences of
-.setStrokeStyle(props?.thickness ?? pathThickness)
+.setStrokeStyle(getStrokeThickness(props))Also applies to: 57-57, 105-105
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated stroke style setting
The code setting stroke style with
props?.thickness ?? pathThicknessis repeated in multiple places. Consider creating a helper function to adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.Here's how you might refactor:
+const getStrokeThickness = (props: ShapeInterface) => props?.thickness ?? pathThickness; // Replace occurrences of -.setStrokeStyle(props?.thickness ?? pathThickness) +.setStrokeStyle(getStrokeThickness(props))Also applies to: 57-57, 105-105
defining: const getStrokeThickness = (thickness?: number) => thickness ?? pathThickness
usage: getStrokeThickness(props?.thickness)
better, no? @coderabbitai
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mustafacagri Yes, that's a great improvement. Defining getStrokeThickness as:
const getStrokeThickness = (thickness?: number) => thickness ?? pathThickness;and using it like:
.setStrokeStyle(getStrokeThickness(props?.thickness))is better because it decouples the function from the props object and makes it more reusable. This approach simplifies the function signature and enhances code clarity. Good catch!
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/App.tsx (2)
14-14: LGTM: Improved state managementThe addition of
pathThicknessstate andpathPointsRefref improves the component's functionality and performance. ManagingpathThicknessas state allows for dynamic updates, while using a ref forpathPointscan optimize performance by avoiding unnecessary re-renders.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of
pathPointsReffor better code readability.+ // Ref to store path points without triggering re-renders const pathPointsRef = useRef<{ x: number; y: number }[]>([])Also applies to: 27-27
385-407: LGTM: Improved right-click handling for path finalizationThe updates to the right-click handling improve the user experience by allowing path finalization on right-click. The logic is consistent with the new path drawing functionality.
Consider simplifying the code for better readability:
- if (shapeType === 'path' && Array.isArray(pathPointsRef.current) && pathPointsRef.current.length > 1) { + if (shapeType === 'path' && pathPointsRef.current.length > 1) { const current = { type: 'path', fillColor: pathColor.current, strokeColor: pathColor.current, - x: 0, - y: 0, points: pathPointsRef.current, instance: stageRef.current?.children[stageRef.current?.children.length - 1] as Shape, thickness: pathThickness, } stageRef.current?.removeChild(currentShape) stageRef.current?.update() - createShape({ - ...current, - }) + createShape(current) pathPointsRef.current = [] setStartPoint(null) + setIsDrawing(false) } - setIsDrawing(false)This refactoring removes unnecessary spread operator usage, simplifies the condition check, and moves
setIsDrawing(false)inside the if block to avoid unnecessary state updates.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/App.tsx (11 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/App.tsx (8)
8-8: LGTM: Appropriate imports addedThe new imports for
defaultPathThickness,ShapeType, andisEmptyare relevant to the changes in the component's functionality. Using lodash'sisEmptyis a good practice for consistent empty checks across different types.Also applies to: 11-11
31-32: LGTM: Helpful utility function addedThe
getStrokeThicknesshelper function is a good addition. It centralizes the logic for determining stroke thickness, adhering to the DRY principle and making the code more maintainable.
53-53: LGTM: Consistent application of stroke thicknessThe changes consistently apply the new
getStrokeThicknessfunction across different shape types in thecreateShapefunction. This improves code consistency and maintainability.Also applies to: 59-59, 107-107
261-267: LGTM: Improved mouse event handling for path drawingThe updates to the mouse event handlers (
handleCanvasMouseDown,handleCanvasMouseMove, andhandleCanvasMouseUp) improve the handling of path drawing. The changes are consistent with the new path drawing functionality and provide a smoother drawing experience.Also applies to: 285-285, 297-299
356-356: LGTM: Comprehensive shape clearingThe addition of
pathPointsRef.current = []in theclearShapesfunction ensures that the path points are reset when clearing all shapes. This maintains consistency between the visual state and the internal data structure.
420-420: LGTM: Proper reset of drawing stateThe addition of
setIsDrawing(false)in the effect hook that runs whenshapeTypechanges is a good practice. It ensures that the drawing state is reset when the user switches between shape types, preventing unexpected behavior.
434-435: LGTM: Proper prop passing for path thickness controlThe addition of
pathThicknessandsetPathThicknessas props to the Sidebar component is appropriate. This allows the Sidebar to control and display the path thickness, which is consistent with the new path thickness functionality.
Line range hint
1-468: Overall: Good improvements to drawing functionalityThe changes in this file significantly enhance the drawing functionality, particularly for path drawing and thickness control. The code is generally well-structured and consistent. A few minor improvements were suggested:
- Adding a comment to explain the purpose of
pathPointsRef.- Refactoring the thickness determination to avoid accessing private properties.
- Simplifying the right-click handling code for better readability.
These changes improve the user experience and code maintainability. Good job on implementing these new features!
📖 Description
This pull request
Tested on
📷 Screenshots or 🎥 Videos
Recording.2024-10-18.050213.mp4
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
pathThicknessproperty in the canvas.Bug Fixes
Documentation