feat: add cache pruning #386
Conversation
mzgoddard
force-pushed
the
prune-caches
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f946d68 to
b3eb8e9
Compare
README.md
Outdated
| // Caches created or modified before `deleteAfter` are not considered for | ||
| // deletion. They must be at least this (default: 2 days) old in | ||
| // milliseconds. | ||
| deleteAfter: 2 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe options:
cachePrune.maxAge
cachePrune.sizeThreshold
cachePrune vs prune. is like "whatever" this is basically just a cache anyway...
mzgoddard
force-pushed
the
prune-caches
branch
5 times, most recently
from
92f5a39 to
b2ac142
Compare
README.md
Outdated
| maxAge: 2 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, | ||
| // All caches together must be larger than `sizeThreshold` before any | ||
| // caches will be deleted. Together they must be at least this | ||
| // (default: 50 MB) in big in bytes. |
lib/SystemPruneCaches.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| static async fromDirectory(dir) { | ||
| const info = new CacheInfo(basename(dir)); | ||
| info.lastModified = +(await stat(join(dir, 'stamp'))).mtime; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why do you need the + here? Isn't this returning a date string?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's a Date object. And the + is implicitly casting it into a Number. I should do better and use Number(...) or .getTime()
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| for (const info of oldInfos) { | ||
| rimraf(join(this.cacheRoot, info.id)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure the state on rimraf. The build is failing and there's an ignored issue from a month ago with folks wondering what's up with the state of the project. Since you're not really using any of the more "advanced" features of rimraf maybe it's not a dep you need?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Interesting. Looks like the build fail is use of const and rimraf 9 months ago was still testing for node 0.10 and 0.12 support which don't support const. hard-source is supporting back to node 8 so I'm not worried about old node incompatibility.
I'm not sure if I want to replace rimraf. hard-source has been using the current version since December (2017). https://www.npmjs.com/search?q=keywords%3Arm is a fun search to look for alternatives though.
- Add `prune` configuration information to README Prune, by default, caches that are older than 2 days after accumulating 50 megabytes of cache.
Fix #84
Prune, by default, caches that are older than 2 days after accumulating 50 megabytes of cache.