Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(core): Make instance role clearer (no-changelog) #10188

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

@n8n-assistant n8n-assistant bot added core Enhancement outside /nodes-base and /editor-ui n8n team Authored by the n8n team labels Jul 25, 2024
@@ -917,12 +917,13 @@ export const schema = {
},
},

instanceRole: {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are we keeping this state in the config though? can this not be a property on one of the services instead?
we should stop using config to store data that user can't configure.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wouldn't feel comfortable making that change without thorough retesting.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was likely done following what was done with instanceType. I think there's value in making instanceRole clearer until we decide to remove all state from the schema. Let me know what you prefer.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! In principle it does, what I'm nervous about is merging this without thorough testing.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The diff looks safe to me. Maybe we can ask someone else to review as well?
or, we can merge this PR, and then I can open a second PR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's bring it in. I'll do some spot checks testing tomorrow but I agree it looks safe.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

cypress bot commented Jul 29, 2024

Passing run #6181 ↗︎

0 388 0 0 Flakiness 0

Details:

🌳 🖥️ browsers:node18.12.0-chrome107 🤖 ivov 🗃️ e2e/*
Project: n8n Commit: b902db9251
Status: Passed Duration: 04:08 💡
Started: Jul 29, 2024 2:18 PM Ended: Jul 29, 2024 2:22 PM

Review all test suite changes for PR #10188 ↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

✅ All Cypress E2E specs passed

@ivov ivov merged commit 99dc56c into master Jul 30, 2024
42 checks passed
@ivov ivov deleted the make-instance-role-clearer branch July 30, 2024 08:20
@janober
Copy link
Member

janober commented Jul 31, 2024

Got released with n8n@1.53.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Enhancement outside /nodes-base and /editor-ui n8n team Authored by the n8n team Released
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants