Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade jest-dev-server from 6.2.0 to 7.0.0 #18

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

naiba4
Copy link
Owner

@naiba4 naiba4 commented Nov 15, 2023

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • packages/scripts/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 168/1000
Why? Confidentiality impact: High, Integrity impact: Low, Availability impact: None, Scope: Unchanged, Exploit Maturity: Proof of Concept, User Interaction (UI): Required, Privileges Required (PR): None, Attack Complexity: Low, Attack Vector: Network, EPSS: 0.01055, Social Trends: No, Days since published: 21, Reachable: No, Transitive dependency: Yes, Is Malicious: No, Business Criticality: High, Provider Urgency: High, Package Popularity Score: 99, Impact: 7.03, Likelihood: 2.39, Score Version: V5
Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-6032459
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: jest-dev-server The new version differs by 4 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 15, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
gutenberg ❌ Failed (Inspect) Nov 15, 2023 7:49am
gutenberg-wd9x ❌ Failed (Inspect) Nov 15, 2023 7:49am

Copy link

Updated dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Packages Version New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
jest-dev-server 6.2.0...7.0.1 None +2/-3 55.3 kB neoziro

Copy link

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Issue Package Version Note Source
Missing license spawnd 7.0.0

Next steps

What is a missing license?

(Experimental) Package does not have a license and consumption legal status is unknown.

A new version of the package should be published that includes a valid SPDX license in a license file, package.json license field or mentioned in the README.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore foo@1.0.0 bar@* or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

  • @SocketSecurity ignore spawnd@7.0.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants