moves uint64 on struct top

[xsteadfastx]

i added ali as apk package for alpine linux. we discovered that it failed on 32 bit arches. this is a try to fix this.

[xsteadfastx]

here are the logs from the build servers: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/jobs/463920

[nakabonne]

Hi, does the fixed-length type have to be on the top of struct fields? I didn't even know that but it's a tiny change, let's merge it.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #109 (f770180) into master (910942e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #109   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.30%   62.30%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         716      716           
=======================================
  Hits          446      446           
  Misses        235      235           
  Partials       35       35           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
attacker/resolver.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 910942e...f770180. Read the comment docs.

[xsteadfastx]

On Mo, 16. Aug 18:59, Ryo Nakao wrote: Hi, does the fixed-length type have to be on the top of struct fields? I didn't even know that but it's a tiny change, let's merge it.

i just found out about it, googling around. i tried it because of this: https://pkg.go.dev/sync/atomic#pkg-note-BUG

[nakabonne]

That makes sense. I learned something new, thank you!

[xsteadfastx]

On Di, 17. Aug 00:00, Ryo Nakao wrote: That makes sense. I learned something new, thank you!

and thank you for your wonderful piece of software!