Frontier scan client #4739
Open
Frontier scan client #4739
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pwojcikdev
force-pushed
the
frontier-scan-5
branch
from
d30b848
to
58e8879
Compare
pwojcikdev
force-pushed
the
frontier-scan-5
branch
from
58e8879
to
ed4c175
Compare
# Conflicts: # nano/core_test/bootstrap_ascending.cpp # nano/node/bootstrap_ascending/database_scan.cpp # nano/node/bootstrap_ascending/service.cpp # nano/node/bootstrap_ascending/service.hpp
# Conflicts: # nano/core_test/utility.cpp # nano/lib/thread_pool.hpp # nano/node/bootstrap_ascending/database_scan.cpp # nano/store/account.hpp # nano/store/iterator.hpp
pwojcikdev
force-pushed
the
frontier-scan-5
branch
from
75700db
to
1e15e8d
Compare
Test Results for Commit 6e68af5Pull Request 4739: Results Test Case Results
Last updated: 2024-10-28 13:16:07 UTC |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This implements frontier scan client for the new bootstrapper. It should be the last missing piece blocking removal of legacy bootstrap code.
Builds on top of #4734
Here are some initial test results from @gr0vity-dev showing that there are no obvious problems.