-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add String.Format #12
Conversation
Hi @ishvedov, I'm nanoFramework bot. A human will be reviewing it shortly. 😉 |
Was testing this with the following code:
but it's throwing at me: |
Not implemented alignment. I'll make it today. |
Oh... I see... for sure we won't need the full blown Format() so it's OK to have a lightweight version. |
After the latest commit I'm getting:
Like I said above, because this is a constrained resource platform no one would be expected to see a fully implemented String.Format |
Problem with broken string.this[] in new firmwares. I wrote it in Slack |
Wait for resolve nanoframework/Home#343 |
Blocked by nanoframework/Home#343. |
The output is now the expected one:
|
- This is required to use nanoFramework.CoreLibrary after nanoframework/CoreLibrary#12 is merged Signed-off-by: José Simões <jose.simoes@eclo.solutions>
After nanoframework/nf-interpreter#743 the output is now 100% correct when compared with the full .NET output:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Speed up to 5 times, less memory usage.
I did it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice improvement! Again: LGTM.
Description
Add String.Format function
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by: ishvedov ivan.shvedov@gmail.com