-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Fix handling of TypeSpec fields #184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
e2378cc
to
55ab0eb
Compare
- GetFieldReferenceId can deal with member references. - Improve handling of TypeSpecs in BuildDependencyList, now it processes the real and fabricated tokens during minimization. - Add more developer notes to explain reasoning and overall functioning for TypeSpecs. - Dumper generator now outputs field references properly. - Add Stack class to test applications.
55ab0eb
to
ee16f56
Compare
Description
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
[tested against nanoclr buildId 55800]
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist: