Update 1 NuGet dependencies

[nfbot]

Bumps nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem from 1.1.54 to 1.1.66

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Updated dependency for nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem to the latest version (1.1.66) for improved functionality.

• Bug Fixes

  • Resolved issues related to the previous version of the nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem dependency.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the packages.lock.json files for both the nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem project and the tests/WebServerE2ETests. The primary modification involves changing the version specifications of the nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem dependency from 1.1.54 to 1.1.66, including updates to the content hash for this dependency. All other dependencies in both files remain unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/...	Updated nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem dependency version from 1.1.54 to 1.1.66.
tests/WebServerE2ETests/...	Updated nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem dependency version from 1.1.54 to 1.1.66.

Possibly related PRs

• Update 3 NuGet dependencies #263: This PR updates the nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem dependency in the packages.lock.json file, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the same dependency's version update.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57a1653 and 6d16282.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)

• nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
• tests/WebServerE2ETests/WebServerE2ETests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
• tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
• tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.lock.json (1)

25-27: Verify compatibility with nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem 1.1.66

The dependency update from 1.1.54 to 1.1.66 is consistent with the PR objectives. Let's verify if this update introduces any breaking changes.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the FileSystem API usage in more detail to ensure there are no compatibility issues.

---

Version update 1.1.54 to 1.1.66 appears safe to proceed

Based on the release notes and codebase analysis:

• The update mainly contains bug fixes for SD card handling and improved unit tests
• No breaking changes are mentioned in the release notes
• The project references are properly updated in the nfproj file
• The changes in v1.1.66 are maintenance-focused (bug fixes and test improvements)

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in nanoFramework.System.IO.FileSystem

# Search for FileSystem API usage in the codebase
echo "Searching for FileSystem API usage..."
rg -l "System\.IO\.FileSystem"

# Check the changelog or release notes
echo "Fetching release information..."
gh release view v1.1.66 --repo nanoframework/System.IO.FileSystem

Length of output: 1273

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for specific FileSystem API usage patterns
echo "Searching for FileSystem API usage patterns..."
rg -A 3 "System\.IO\.FileSystem" --type cs

# Check project references
echo "Checking project references..."
cat nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem.nfproj | grep -A 5 "System.IO.FileSystem"

Length of output: 1041

tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.lock.json (1)

31-33: LGTM! Consistent dependency version with main project

The test project's dependency version (1.1.66) matches the main project, ensuring proper test coverage with the updated dependency.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud