Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove read access to memory #2005

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 9, 2021

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

Description

  • Completely in nanobooter.
  • To CODE and DEPLOYMENT blocks in CLR.

Motivation and Context

  • Improves security by removing read access to these storage blocks.

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
  • Unit Tests (work on Unit Tests, has no impact on code or features)
  • Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

- Completely in nanobooter.
- To CODE and DEPLOYMENT blocks in CLR.
@josesimoes josesimoes force-pushed the remove-read-access-to-memory branch from bb6f123 to 4c2e984 Compare August 9, 2021 15:01
@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit f981b9b into nanoframework:develop Aug 9, 2021
@josesimoes josesimoes deleted the remove-read-access-to-memory branch August 9, 2021 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants