Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add compiler definition to use memory allocation for larger debugger vars #2015

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2021

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

Description

  • Add compiler definition to use memory allocation for larger debugger vars.
  • Update debugger functions using these large vars to use memalloc insteed.
  • Update ST_NUCLEO64_F091RC to demo this.

Motivation and Context

  • Need to reduce stress in stack in resource constrained targets.

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
  • Unit Tests (work on Unit Tests, has no impact on code or features)
  • Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

…vars

- Update ST_NUCLEO64_F091RC to demo this.
@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit 7a4728a into nanoframework:develop Aug 17, 2021
@josesimoes josesimoes deleted the improve-mem-allocation branch August 17, 2021 12:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants