Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct comment about heap for STM32 targets #794

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2018

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

Description

Motivation and Context

  • Comment was outdated and misleading

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Signed-off-by: José Simões jose.simoes@eclo.solutions

Signed-off-by: José Simões <jose.simoes@eclo.solutions>
@josesimoes josesimoes added Type: enhancement Series: STM32xx Everything related specifically with STM32 targets labels Jul 18, 2018
@nfbot
Copy link
Member

nfbot commented Jul 18, 2018

Hi @josesimoes,

I'm nanoFramework bot.
Thank you for your contribution!

A human will be reviewing it shortly. 😉

@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit 63abb76 into nanoframework:develop Jul 18, 2018
@josesimoes josesimoes deleted the correct-comment-heap branch July 18, 2018 13:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Series: STM32xx Everything related specifically with STM32 targets Type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants