Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add native implementation of resource utility #844

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2018

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

Description

Motivation and Context

  • Add support for ResourceUtility class in nanoFramework.Runtime.Native. Allows access to managed app resources.

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Signed-off-by: José Simões jose.simoes@eclo.solutions

@josesimoes josesimoes added Type: enhancement Area: Common libs Everything related with common libraries labels Sep 7, 2018
@nfbot
Copy link
Member

nfbot commented Sep 7, 2018

Hi @josesimoes,

I'm nanoFramework bot.
Thank you for your contribution!

A human will be reviewing it shortly. 😉

Signed-off-by: José Simões <jose.simoes@eclo.solutions>
@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit a3508ce into nanoframework:develop Sep 7, 2018
@josesimoes josesimoes deleted the add-resource-utility branch September 7, 2018 17:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Common libs Everything related with common libraries Type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants