Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Combining split_on_adapter with duplex calling #17

Open
Coryza opened this issue Aug 10, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

Combining split_on_adapter with duplex calling #17

Coryza opened this issue Aug 10, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@Coryza
Copy link

Coryza commented Aug 10, 2022

Hi,

From your readme.md it's unclear for me if / how to one can combine the split_on_adapter tool with the guppy duplex calling? The output files of the first do not match with the input files of the second - and I see no parameter in the guppy duplex basecaller to indicate that potentially reads have been split.

Thanks,

Koen

@Rasinj
Copy link

Rasinj commented Aug 10, 2022

Hi @Coryza, you would be better off relying on the read splitting that is already integrated in guppy, it works in a similar fashion to split_on_adapter and should make for a more seamless workflow as well. There is a --do_read_splitting option that you can give to guppy_basecaller (and to guppy_basecaller_duplex). I would also suggest setting the --min_score_read_splitting to 58 if doing this.

@Coryza
Copy link
Author

Coryza commented Aug 10, 2022 via email

@Rasinj
Copy link

Rasinj commented Aug 11, 2022

Hi Koen,

Sorry for later reply this time. There is a .cfg file in the barcoding folder in guppy/data where you can change the mid-adapter. I would have to refer to someone else for the guppy questions unfortunately, possibly better asked on the community I think.

@callumparr
Copy link

Is duplex calling restricted to kit 12 chemistry and above? Judging by the guppy config files it seems this is the case.

@onordesjo
Copy link

@callumparr, I don't think there's any restriction to kit12 chemistry and above, but I shall ask around and check. It may not be supported, but that also may not stop it from being possible (:

@onordesjo
Copy link

@callumparr, people are responding that it should work in principle even if we don't support it. I wouldn't say there'd be any harm in trying if you happen to have some and see what happens!

@callumparr
Copy link

From alignments alone, I am seeing some potential. So updated guppy should output potential partners regardless of the config file used?

Also in general about the duplex. Is the length of the follow-on strand always similar?

I am seeing some alignments that overlap but on the opposite strands for the same read but often the alignment for the later portion of the read is shorter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants