Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix docs #136

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 23, 2021
Merged

Fix docs #136

merged 7 commits into from
Mar 23, 2021

Conversation

evaporei
Copy link
Collaborator

I've reviewed the other chapters, tell me what do ya think πŸ™‚

Next pull request should be code only πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»

@evaporei evaporei requested a review from naomijub March 22, 2021 03:40
@evaporei evaporei self-assigned this Mar 22, 2021
- `<=` means lesser or equal, so if `a <= 100`, this means that the entity map key `a` must be lesser or equals to `100`.
- `>` means greater, so if `a > 100`, this means that the entity map key `a` must be greater than `100`.
- `<` means lesser, so if `a < 100`, this means that the entity map key `a` must be lesser than `100`.
- `==` means equals, so if `a == 100`, this means that the entity map key `a` must equal to `100`.
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again, equals is equivalent to the verb, so a must equals to x is correct, and I prefer. While this change was correct != means not equal, so if a != 100 because it refers to the mathematics operation.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It shouldn't have the s because the equality is being referred to the key, which is singular.

I think the equals in the beginning of the sentence is the one that describes what you've said correctly, that's why it has the s.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but it is the subject and not the mathematical operation

@naomijub naomijub merged commit 4f85133 into main Mar 23, 2021
@naomijub naomijub deleted the fix-docs branch March 23, 2021 23:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants