Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 5 cFE requirements #787

Closed
dmknutsen opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #789 or #816
Closed

Update 5 cFE requirements #787

dmknutsen opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #789 or #816
Milestone

Comments

@dmknutsen
Copy link
Contributor

As part of the cFE certification effort, several requirements have been identified as in need of update:

  1. cES1005.1 (cFE-59 in JIRA): Need to remove Application Load Address from the list of command parameters in the start application command (ES) to reflect implementation.
  2. cTBL6003.1 (CFE-311 in JIRA): Need to update requirement verbiage to reduce ambiguity.
    a. Old verbiage: If a Table Validation Function exists for the specified Table, the Inactive Table Image shall be validated.
    b. New verbiage: The cFE shall reject an activate table command for a table that has a validation function but has not been validated.
  3. cEVS3103.4, cEVS3103.5, and cEVS3001 (CFE-237, 239, and 201): Requirements imply that the Event Format Mode is SB controlled/commandable when in fact it is controlled by EVS. Need to swap SB with EVS.

Requester Info
Dan Knutsen
NASA Goddard

skliper pushed a commit to skliper/cFE that referenced this issue Aug 3, 2020
 nasa#787
 - cES1005.1: Remove application load address from start app command
 - cTBL6003.1: Clarify table validation pior to activate
 - cEVS3103.4, cEVS3103.5, cEVS3001: Remove SB qualifier
 nasa#587
 - cSB4344: Added get packet type API requirement
 - cSB4345: Added message ID validation API requirement
astrogeco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 14, 2020
@astrogeco astrogeco added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Oct 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants