Rename OMIT Deprecated flags with cFS codename instead of cFE version

[astrogeco]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Nomenclature for deprecation can be confusing

Describe the solution you'd like
Create new deprecated flag for Bootes and maybe replace the deprecate 6_7 with deprecate Aquila

Describe alternatives you've considered
Keeping the current nomenclature

Additional context
Originally suggested in #784

does DEPRECATE_6_8 means that 6.8 was the last version which supports this function?

Yes, that is the paradigm we've been using up to this point -- the number reflects the last release were it was not deprecated. The idea of putting a version number in the tag was so we'd know which ones had "aged out" in a future release and should be taken out completely.

However as I mentioned before now that we have a codename for API compatibility then maybe we should consider using that instead.

Originally posted by @jphickey in #784 (comment)

Requester Info
Gerardo E. Cruz-Ortiz, NASA-GSFC

[skliper]

Might not be worth changing the old 6_7 over since that code can all be removed any time in this cycle.

[jphickey]

See PR #817 -- removes all currently deprecated code blocks.

Probably don't really need to do anything - just come up with a codename-based convention for future deprecated blocks.

[skliper]

Per the most recent versioning discussion - all the current deprecated code will be removed (or has been) as part of this major release development cycle. Going forward the deprecate flags will not include a version number (like the osal model), or the codename.