Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #1890, Improve resource ID branch coverage #1891

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2021

Conversation

skliper
Copy link
Contributor

@skliper skliper commented Aug 25, 2021

Describe the contribution
Fix #1890 - pushes resource ID coverage to 100/100

Note it was just an out-of-order test where Id was made invalid before the section that needed a valid Id to get full coverage, so swapped the tests.

Testing performed
Build/run/report coverage for unit tests

Expected behavior changes
None

System(s) tested on

  • Hardware: Intel i5/Docker
  • OS: Ubuntu 18.04
  • Versions: Bundle main + this commit

Additional context
None

Third party code
None

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC

@skliper skliper added the CCB:Ready Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) label Aug 25, 2021
@skliper skliper added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Aug 25, 2021
@astrogeco astrogeco requested review from pepepr08 and zanzaben August 30, 2021 19:07
@astrogeco astrogeco changed the base branch from main to integration-candidate August 30, 2021 21:19
@astrogeco astrogeco merged commit d145434 into nasa:integration-candidate Aug 30, 2021
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2021
@astrogeco astrogeco removed the CCB:Ready Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) label Sep 1, 2021
@astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

CCB:2021-09-01 APPROVED

@astrogeco astrogeco added the CCB:Approved Indicates code review and approval by community CCB label Sep 1, 2021
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2021
**Combines**

nasa/cFE#1885,              v6.8.0-rc1+dev980
nasa/osal#1138,             v5.1.0-rc1+dev598
nasa/cFS-GroundSystem#195,  v2.2.0-rc1+dev63

**Includes**

*cFE*

nasa/cFE#1870, Add SB API test cases
nasa/cFE#1869, Add ES API test cases
nasa/cFE#1872, Add TBL API test cases
nasa/cFE#1871, Add FS API test cases
nasa/cFE#1860, Add Time Clock Test
nasa/cFE#1862, EVS coverage test
nasa/cFE#1876, SB test improvements
nasa/cFE#1865, CFE_TBL_Modified: Test CRC, updated flag
nasa/cFE#1881, Improve EVS code coverage
nasa/cFE#1877, add call to CFE_ES_ExitChildTask
nasa/cFE#1902, Incorrect OSAL Format in Users Guide Reference
nasa/cFE#1884, Improve FS coverage
nasa/cFE, Improve MSG branch coverage
nasa/cFE#1891, Improve resource ID branch coverage
nasa/cFE#1894, Improve SBR branch coverage
nasa/cFE#1896, Fix #1895, Improve TIME branch coverage
nasa/cFE#1904, Improve TBL code coverage
nasa/cFE#1864, Support custom PSP directory
nasa/cFE#1913, Update time tests to use bitmask check macros
nasa/cFE#1923, remove extra word in comment

*osal*

nasa/osal#1136, add bitmask assert macros

*cFS-GroundSystem*

nasa/cFS-GroundSystem#190, Fix #189, Virtualenv and Pipenv .gitignore support
nasa/cFS-GroundSystem#194, Fix doc, comment, and message typos

Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman           <skliper@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey           <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Campbell           <zanzaben@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ariel Adams             <ArielSAdamsNASA@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose F Martinez Pedraza <pepepr08@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Avi                     <thnkslprpt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul                    <pavll@users.noreply.github.com>
@skliper skliper deleted the fix1890-rid_coverage branch October 22, 2021 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CCB:Approved Indicates code review and approval by community CCB
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RID missing branch coverage
3 participants