-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 219
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Impossible to test OS_CONSOLE_ASYNC false case #957
Comments
I'm trying to recall why this was removed from osconfig.h ... It is still relevant/preferable to run in this mode for debugging situations. Many times OS_printf is used for debugging and if the actual output is decoupled, it can change the order with which things appear. It also saves the memory cost of another task+stack in constrained environments. If I understand correctly the issue here is limited to the "create_impl" function only - since it can't easily be tested with the flag as false. Maybe a compromise solution would be to move the boolean from the impl layer to the shared layer, which would allow the impl coverage test to set it both ways at least. |
I'd rather make it an option that can be tested functionally or remove it. Coverage testing with overrides doesn't prove all the logic works together. Option - ifndef make it async=true. |
Or relate it to OS_DEBUG or similar, and/or note the expected context/reasoning. |
I consider it similar to the shell switch or something like that - for FSW the user chooses which way to configure it and then it gets compiled in that config, but for coverage test - due to the design and its "backdoor" methods of running things directly, it can still test it both ways, regardless of how its configured in FSW. Right now even that's not possible because of the proximity to the definition and the runtime check. If they were in separate units, this would be easily doable. Can also resurrect this as an osconfig option. As I said, I don't recall why it was removed, but might have been before osconfig.h was converted to osconfig.cmake. In the current design there shouldn't be a problem of having this option, and defaulting it to true. I'd rather not tie it to OS_DEBUG - although that's one justification for changing it - simply saving the cost of an extra task+stack might be worthwhile to some users. |
Puts the "async" option into the shared layer instead of the impl layer. This allows both options to be coverage tested and also allows a bit more of the logic to be common instead of duplicated in the 3 implementations. This also adds back an osconfig option to allow the user to elect this mode at configuration time.
…tion Fix #957, move async console option
…tion Fix #957, move async console option
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Now that OS_CONSOLE_ASYNC is defined locally, it's impossible to functionally test false case or get full branch coverage on
OS_ConsoleCreate_Impl
without modifying the code under test:osal/src/os/vxworks/src/os-impl-console.c
Lines 41 to 48 in ba0ac40
osal/src/os/vxworks/src/os-impl-console.c
Lines 146 to 148 in ba0ac40
Describe the solution you'd like
Either need to be able to exercise this option or remove it.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None
Additional context
Prevents full branch coverage
Requester Info
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: