Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIXED] Don't ack msgs if we are filtered and they are not applicable. #5639

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

derekcollison
Copy link
Member

When checking interest state, make sure to take into account filtered consumers when acking msgs.
We were checking interest state on a leader change but we would ack msgs that may not be applicable to our consumer.

Resolves: #5612

Signed-off-by: Derek Collison derek@nats.io

… consumers when acking msgs.

Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
@derekcollison derekcollison requested a review from a team as a code owner July 10, 2024 20:22
Copy link
Member

@kozlovic kozlovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I think it will also resolve the issue recently reported that sounds really similar: #5638

@derekcollison derekcollison merged commit 3dea260 into main Jul 10, 2024
3 checks passed
@derekcollison derekcollison deleted the issue-5612 branch July 10, 2024 20:43
wallyqs added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

work queue stream losing messages
2 participants