Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for DHCP ranges to InfoBlox #328

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2024

Conversation

jmcgill298
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jmcgill298 jmcgill298 requested review from qduk, jdrew82 and a team as code owners January 18, 2024 03:41
@jdrew82 jdrew82 added type: enhancement New feature or request integration: infoblox Issues/PRs for Infoblox integration labels Jan 18, 2024
@jdrew82
Copy link
Contributor

jdrew82 commented Jan 18, 2024

@jmcgill298 Looks mostly good to me. Can we get the tests fixed?

@jmcgill298
Copy link
Contributor Author

ya, I think the issue is my use of Typing. I should be able to fix that with futures, but I also want to merge Adam and my test class that we both created for the InfoBlox Adapter. I should have this in today

@jmcgill298 jmcgill298 force-pushed the jacobm/infoblox/feature-dhcp-ranges branch from dc44b2f to 6977e4e Compare January 18, 2024 23:49
@jmcgill298 jmcgill298 force-pushed the jacobm/infoblox/feature-dhcp-ranges branch from 6977e4e to d1582e8 Compare January 19, 2024 14:47
Copy link
Contributor

@jdrew82 jdrew82 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jdrew82 jdrew82 merged commit f1b5b81 into develop Jan 25, 2024
15 checks passed
@jdrew82 jdrew82 deleted the jacobm/infoblox/feature-dhcp-ranges branch January 25, 2024 16:38
@jdrew82 jdrew82 mentioned this pull request Feb 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integration: infoblox Issues/PRs for Infoblox integration type: enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants