Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: secure p2p #354
feat: secure p2p #354
Changes from all commits
184df97
968c1d8
58beb05
f82b2c0
bee9805
822afbc
4d40f3d
75d0eb8
1f9b253
a062f78
2c5fafb
6ef49a9
9e6d1ef
b4b04be
3bd5077
4ca4fe6
60b5154
d260b29
255cfce
c1220b0
9c195cc
1e0da10
3b5352b
1d2f233
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rather have longer names here and in other places, like
msg_encryption_pk
,msg_signature_pk
. People and other developers can confuse these with key shares.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is kind of like a preparation for #330
Ideally nodes should be identified by the account id they use for interacting with the contract and the participant id should be given to them at runtime by the contract
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI I want Michel to take a look at this to make sure we are not misusing anything here, will let you know how it goes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sounds good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@itegulov Are we good to go?