Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: add contract testing without nodes #685

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

feat: add contract testing without nodes #685

merged 9 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

ChaoticTempest
Copy link
Member

Add contract testing without integration testing setup

volovyks
volovyks approved these changes Jul 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@volovyks volovyks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@ChaoticTempest ChaoticTempest merged commit 7277413 into develop Jul 17, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@ChaoticTempest ChaoticTempest deleted the phuong/feat/contract-testing-without-nodes branch July 17, 2024 16:44
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Terraform Feature Environment Destroy (dev-685)

Terraform Initialization ⚙️success

Terraform Destroy success

Show Destroy Plan 


No changes. No objects need to be destroyed.

Either you have not created any objects yet or the existing objects were
already deleted outside of Terraform.

Destroy complete! Resources: 0 destroyed.

Pusher: @ChaoticTempest, Action: pull_request, Working Directory: ``, Workflow: Terraform Feature Env (Destroy)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@volovyks volovyks volovyks approved these changes

@ailisp ailisp Awaiting requested review from ailisp

@ppca ppca Awaiting requested review from ppca

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@ChaoticTempest @volovyks @ppca