-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: update nearcore
crates from 0.17
-> 0.20
#1130
Conversation
81bb8bc
to
707c445
Compare
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ jobs: | |||
strategy: | |||
matrix: | |||
platform: [ubuntu-latest, macos-latest] | |||
toolchain: [stable, 1.69.0] | |||
toolchain: [stable, 1.72.1] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
error[E0659]: `opentelemetry` is ambiguous
--> /home/user/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/near-o11y-0.19.0/src/lib.rs:6:9
|
6 | pub use opentelemetry::OpenTelemetryLevel;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ambiguous name
|
= note: ambiguous because of multiple potential import sources
= note: `opentelemetry` could refer to a crate passed with `--extern`
= help: use `::opentelemetry` to refer to this crate unambiguously
note: `opentelemetry` could also refer to the module defined here
--> /home/user/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/near-o11y-0.19.0/src/lib.rs:22:1
|
22 | mod opentelemetry;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= help: use `crate::opentelemetry` to refer to this module unambiguously
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0659`.
error: could not compile `near-o11y` (lib) due to previous error
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
buildkite script has to be corrected https://buildkite.com/nearprotocol/near-sdk-rs/builds/5218#018d0c88-ae78-49e7-8789-577def4a19da
707c445
to
10164c3
Compare
…imes-non-default`
fcb4764
to
38db16d
Compare
38db16d
to
22aedbf
Compare
48f0934
to
91d786e
Compare
nearcore
crates from 0.17
-> 0.19
nearcore
crates from 0.17
-> 0.20
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, since it is already in a compilable state, I would merge it and iterate in a separate PR.
struct GasWeightSer(u64); | ||
|
||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, serde::Serialize, PartialEq, Eq)] | ||
pub enum MockAction { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am trying to understand if receipt_index
is actually necessary at this level, and if the types mismatch with the blockchain is justified... @dj8yfo What is your understanding here?
@austinabell Can you shed some light here by any chance?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't remember the context, and I don't know about the nearcore updates. I can think about it more another time, but I wouldn't wait on my response, sorry!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dj8yfo Great job! Thanks you for pulling it out. I plan to cut 5.0.0-alpha.2 after merging this one
No description provided.