Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

store: return raw bytes from Trie::retrieve_node #7535

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 6, 2022

Conversation

blasrodri
Copy link
Contributor

@blasrodri blasrodri commented Sep 2, 2022

This will be needed in future commit where we will need access to the
raw bytes of the node. See #7509.

@blasrodri blasrodri marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2022 08:30
@blasrodri blasrodri requested a review from a team as a code owner September 2, 2022 08:30
@mina86 mina86 requested review from mina86 and removed request for matklad September 2, 2022 14:24
@mina86 mina86 changed the title update Trie::retrieve_node store: return raw bytes from Trie::retrieve_node Sep 2, 2022
@mina86
Copy link
Contributor

mina86 commented Sep 2, 2022

@matklad
Copy link
Contributor

matklad commented Sep 6, 2022

@blasrodri could do the above so that we can make this PR up-to-date with master and merge it? Basically, our infra requires three things to merge a PR:

  • its is up-to-date with master
  • it has a ✔️ review
  • it has the auto-merge label

I think if you yourself merge/rebase this PR to be up-to-date it should also get in, but keep an eye on the review status, sometimes it breaks when you push to the branch (but maybe I am imagining things? Don't know the exact rules github is using).

@near-bulldozer near-bulldozer bot merged commit a34992e into near:master Sep 6, 2022
nikurt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2022
This will be needed in future commit where we will need access to the
raw bytes of the node.  See #7509.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants