-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOCS: QHub 101 #1011
DOCS: QHub 101 #1011
Conversation
This seems like a good start but I'm not convinced this "fixes" #301, especially given the spaCy example that Tania posted. I think we need to fill out the skeleton with some content before we merge. |
Hi @magsol I am currently working on this. I just added the skeleton here to act as a base for me to further push the apt content 😅 I have kept the PR as a draft and will make it open for review once I am done with it. |
Ack, sorry! My mistake. Carry on :) |
what is the status of this? @HarshCasper @magsol |
Ah! I somehow missed Harsh's most recent changes. I'll review as soon as I can. Thanks @HarshCasper ! |
@HarshCasper I fixed some spelling errors that GitHub flagged, but I'm still seeing link 404s in the Actions. Visual inspection says that these links are fine, but I wanted to check with you before merging. |
I have fixed all of them. Thanks for fixing the Vale errors :) |
Looks like there are some Vale errors in other docs but those can be fixed in a separate PR. I'll go ahead and merge this as soon as I can. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Vale errors were fixed, looks good to merge.
* DOCS: Add skeleton for QHub 101 * DOC: Add QHub 101 doc for general-purpose overview * Fixed multiple Vale style checks and spelling errors. * FIX: Fix broken links Co-authored-by: Shannon Quinn <magsol@gmail.com>
Fixes #301