Replies: 4 comments 3 replies
-
What's your Netbox version? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
v3.5.6
…On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 2:06 PM Brian Candler ***@***.***> wrote:
What's your Netbox version?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#15175 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFQ75FQ2NWX4OTZ5BJ3EFWLYT6U25AVCNFSM6AAAAABDMDUMVWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4DIOJWGE4TM>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
--
Salvador Bertenbreiter
(+51) 947 145 352
(+57) 323 802 9009
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hi,
Yes, but all terminations (on one side) must end on the same device, that's
the limitation I'm facing. I would like to put 1 interface in side A, but
in side Z add interface X in device 1 and interface Y in device 2
…On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 4:00 PM Brian Candler ***@***.***> wrote:
No, it was v3.3.0 I believe.
I think you're probably just finding the UI confusing. When you add or
edit a cable, you can select multiple terminations.
image.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/assets/44789/5d46d073-8af0-41ed-a930-3127c88e2857>
But you are allowed to change the selected "Device", then click the "+"
button next to Interface, and then you can select interfaces from that new
device, and so on.
However, the list of interfaces shown only gives their names, not the
devices they belong to. This can be especially confusing if you're
connecting to the same named interface on multiple devices (which is quite
common). #10841 <#10841>
shows an example of that.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#15175 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFQ75FTBEFOZVT6WS53EGPTYT7CHRAVCNFSM6AAAAABDMDUMVWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4DIOJXGAZDS>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
--
Salvador Bertenbreiter
(+51) 947 145 352
(+57) 323 802 9009
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I assume this does not apply to wireless links, creating multiple connections for wireless links |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi Netbox community,
I hope you're doing well. In many cases we use MPO breakout cables to connect one device to multiple interfaces in other device, but in other cases we use MPO breakout to connect one device to interfaces in multiple devices (for example: 1 100GBASE-SR4 interface in the switch connected to via MPO breakout to four servers). Unfortunately I haven't find a way to use the interface connection to multiple devices, it only allows multiple interfaces in a single device. Is there any plan to include that? Or am I missing something?
I'm currently using as a workaround to add multiple "virtual" interfaces (like eth1/1, eth1/2, eth1/3, eth1/4) instead of a single interface, but I would prefer the other way.
But as you can see, it doesn't look good
Best regards,
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions