-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability to use asset tags in rack view instead of device names #494
Comments
ingeba
changed the title
[Feature request] Being able to use asset tags in racks view instead of device names
[Feature request] Being able to use asset tags in rack view instead of device names
Aug 19, 2016
jeremystretch
changed the title
[Feature request] Being able to use asset tags in rack view instead of device names
Being able to use asset tags in rack view instead of device names
Aug 19, 2016
jeremystretch
changed the title
Being able to use asset tags in rack view instead of device names
Ability to use asset tags in rack view instead of device names
Aug 19, 2016
This feature request hasn't gotten any traction in a year. I've added the asset tag to the pop-up bubble, which should be sufficient. |
jeremystretch
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2017
Merged
lampwins
pushed a commit
to lampwins/netbox
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2017
…on rack elevation
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
For our DC's, the current solution of using names in the graphical overview of racks does not work too well:
We may of course duplicate the asset tag in the name field, but then we are no longer able to find hardware given its currently assigned FQDN.
Instead we prefer to use asset tags in rack view but keep FQDN's as names for those devices that has it. All devices at our sites are regarded as assets and registered with a unique tag with reasonable length upon arrival, following the hardware to its death. We have made a small patch to Netbox to use asset tags instead of names in rack views and instead include the name with the other information given in the mouse-over hover bubble. We have also increased the maximum name size to support all our FQDN's.
Of course what suits us may not suit all, but having this as an option would be good for us and maybe others?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: