Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VLAN “Service Identifier” field (VXLAN or ISID) #777

Closed
DouglasHeriot opened this issue Jan 5, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

VLAN “Service Identifier” field (VXLAN or ISID) #777

DouglasHeriot opened this issue Jan 5, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@DouglasHeriot
Copy link

DouglasHeriot commented Jan 5, 2017

We have an Avaya fabric core network, where ISIDs are mapped to VLANs on the access switches. We have many VLANs created in Netbox, and need a way to map them back to unique ISIDs.

When we have the same VID used across multiple sites, they each have unique ISIDs.
This is similar to VXLAN trunks, or Q-in-Q ​​#116 service VLANs.

I propose a "Service Identifier" field that can be used to track this unique number. (VXLAN and ISIDs are both 24-bit)

I plan to have a go at implementing this myself.

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Tagging this as potentially related to #116.

@f0o f0o mentioned this issue Jan 21, 2017
DouglasHeriot added a commit to hillsong/netbox that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2017
@candlerb
Copy link
Contributor

Would creating a "Custom Field" on the ipam > VLAN object be usable for this? Or if not, maybe the Custom Field functionality can be enhanced to make it usable?

@DouglasHeriot
Copy link
Author

I think you’re right – a custom field probably is the right way to do this. Most people don’t need to track ISIDs or VXLANs, so it doesn’t make sense to have it cluttering up the interface.

There are a few enhancements to custom fields that would be good to make it more usable however:

But for now, I think custom fields will work well enough for us to get started tracking this information better.
I’ll start investigating how difficult it would be to implement some of these things.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 19, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants