-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include circuit terminations when importing new circuits #815
Comments
v1.8.0 introduced the concept of circuit terminations, of which each circuit can have up to two. You'll need to first create the desired circuit, and then add terminations (either to a site or to a specific device within that site) separately. I realize this isn't the most intuitive workflow. It may be workable to combine the creation of a circuit and its first termination in the same form, but I haven't yet looked into it. |
Ok - that makes sense from what I'm seeing then. I add circuits as we get the turn-up information from the carrier, which is often before active equipment arrives. It's would be nice to have it tied to a specific site at this point. Same goes for importing circuits as I see Site is no longer a field there. If I import 100 circuits, they're now somewhat orphaned because I have no other metadata that tells me what site it belongs to. Other circuits don't ever get a termination (ie broadband circuit to a SOHO router) but we still want to have a list of circuits per site. |
This is going to be fairly difficult to implement given the current model for circuit terminations, but it's up for grabs if anyone wants to dig into it. |
This is almost certainly going to be much easier to accomplish once #4347 has added JSON/YAML-based import for all objects. Marking this as blocked pending that work. |
When adding or editing a circuit, there is no longer a field for Site. Previous to ~1.8.2 you could select the Site that the circuit was associated with.
I do see that I can edit the terminations of the circuit once it's created, but we don't always have a termination point when adding the circuit for the first time.
Is this intended behavior or a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: