-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Be able to group Custom Fields #8495
Comments
Issue #4499 suggests the same thing, but was closed with a reference to the FAQ. I can't find the relevant information in the FAQ anymore. |
Suggesting to add some sort of "custom section" that the custom fields are added in to. |
Is the proposal here to mimic the |
Yes that would be sufficient on the model side.
… On 1 Feb 2022, at 22:25, Jeremy Stretch ***@***.***> wrote:
Is the proposal here to mimic the group_name on CustomLink, which is just an (optional) text field? I think that'd be reasonable.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
This FR was the focus of today's live coding session! The recording is available here for anyone interested. |
Closes #8495: Enable custom field grouping
I ended up just splitting the groups into different tables within the same panels, to avoid user confusion over what is and is not a custom field. |
NetBox version
v3.1.6
Feature type
New functionality
Proposed functionality
Add a label/group field to a custom field and render a box with all the grouped fields within that box.
The template which renders the custom fields should group all fields with a group set and render a new box with the fields in.
Use case
To help the user find the information they are looking for.
It makes it easier to sift through lots of fields if they are grouped, because then you only need to focus on finding the right group before diving into each field.
Database changes
Add a group or label field to the custom field model.
External dependencies
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: