-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: GenericRelation for Secrets #2351
Conversation
Release v1.6.3
Release v1.7.0
Release v1.7.1
Release v1.7.2
Release v1.7.2-r1
Release v1.7.3
Release v1.8.0
Release v1.8.1
Release v1.8.2
Release v1.8.3
Release v1.8.4
Release v1.9.0
Release v1.9.0-r1
Release v1.9.1
Release v1.9.2
Release v1.9.3
Release v1.9.4
Release v1.9.4-r1
Release v1.9.5
Release v1.9.6
Release v2.0.0
Release v2.0.1
Release v2.0.2
Release v2.0.3
Release v2.0.4
Release v2.0.5
Release v2.0.6
Release v2.0.7
Release v2.0.8
Release v2.0.9
Release v2.2.7
Release v2.2.8
Release v2.2.9
Release v2.2.10
Release v2.3.0
Release v2.3.1
Release v2.3.2
Release v2.3.3
Release v2.3.4
Release v2.3.5
Release v2.3.6
Release v2.3.7
Release v2.4.0
Release v2.4.1
Release v2.4.2
Release v2.4.3
I'll address the formatting errors in the test, I'm having problem figuring out how to accept an object through the Serializers. My test failures say object required field. We cannot pass an object directly, but instead an object_id and content_type |
Ever seen CI fail with psycopg2.OperationalError: FATAL: database "netbox" does not exist shouldn't CI be running against netbox_test? |
WSGIPassAuthorization fails if libapache2-mod-wsgi-py3 is missing
Add missing library
…6-patch-1 Revert "Add missing library"
Release v2.4.4
…1503-secret-agent
Closing this out due to lack of activity. Might take another look at this for v2.6. |
Instead of answeing my question you throw away 8 hours of effort? Now that
I know how you treat contributors I will never make that mistake again.
…On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 12:18 PM Jeremy Stretch ***@***.*** wrote:
Closing this out due to lack of activity. Might take another look at this
for v2.6.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2351 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGOQ3t7binpU1DGG2susxKzcAe3b6VRrks5usJ0NgaJpZM4V48d6>
.
|
Fixes: #1503
This change replaces the Device Foreign Key with a GenericRelationship that allows extending the scope of Secrets. Currently there are test failures for the API updating devices. This work does not include extending the Secrets to any additional objects, yet. This is an example output from the api:
The 'device' node is replaced with 'object' which includes the 'class' of 'device'