Edge Weight first pass for VFOI

[jdanish]

Add the option to include edge weight into the net.create interface.

• Add a weight attribute which is a number above 0 to the edge editing interface.
• For backwards compatibility, assume a weight of 1 if nothing was there, and add it.
• Have a template settable maximum size for how edges are displayed so anything above that number is displayed as that number. Long-term we might also want this to be based on node size.
• long-term, Kalani would like to be able to turn the max on / off if possible. Not needed short-term.
• Add to filters.
• Add to table view.

[daveseah]

Did we make a reference anywhere for what the needed files to touch were?

[benloh]

See #252 for a reference that covers all the steps.

[daveseah]

Have a template settable maximum size for how edges are displayed so anything above that number is displayed as that number. Long-term we might also want this to be based on node size.

I'm assuming that this means the maximum width of the line in a unit like pixels.

[jdanish]

Yes, the actual number in the edge table should not change, but the display should have a maximum width so that we don't blow out the rest of the graph.

[daveseah]

Yes, the actual number in the edge table should not change, but the display should have a maximum width so that we don't blow out the rest of the graph.

I am still a bit confused by this phrasing. Does "actual number in the edge table" refer to the the count of edges? or is this a link to the weight attribute being added?

• If it's count, that implies to me that we limit how many edges can be shown somehow.
• If it's weight, then that ties the "weight" concept to a visual representation "line width".
• If it's not either, then I am missing what this means

[jdanish]

My understanding (@kalanicraig please verify):

Each edge has a weight. Right now, all edges are defaulting to 1.
The width of the line between two nodes is the sum of edge weights. So 2 edges of weight 1 is a total of 2, but 2 edges of weight 2 is a total of 4.

So if we have:

A -> B weight 2
B -> A weight 2
A -> B weight 1

All three would be listed in the edge table. However, when drawing the line between A and B, the system would note that there is a total weight of 5. If the max is 5, it'll draw it that way. If the max is 4, it'll draw a width 4 line, but if you look at the tables or filters the weights will be as listed above.

Incidentally, the display would be a bi-directional arrow in this case A <-> B.

That help? Sorry to be unclear.

[daveseah]

That helps a lot! Thanks! I didn't realize that bidirectional edges were modeled in this way, so that was my missing bit of knowledge to make sense of it.

[jdanish]

Well, we are breaking some norms but I am AOK with that as it gives us flexibility. People can enforce norms on their own if they want. :).