Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Datapath healing doesn't work #306

Closed
NikitaSkrynnik opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by networkservicemesh/sdk-kernel#535
Closed

Datapath healing doesn't work #306

NikitaSkrynnik opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by networkservicemesh/sdk-kernel#535
Assignees

Comments

@NikitaSkrynnik
Copy link
Collaborator

Build

https://github.com/networkservicemesh/integration-k8s-packet/actions/runs/3420470537/jobs/5695332511

Logs

default-logs.zip

@glazychev-art
Copy link
Collaborator

glazychev-art commented Nov 14, 2022

Found that the addresses we use for ipams in our examples overlap packet addresses.
This is for example 172.16.1.100 which we use very often. In other words, we see a working ping when it should not be.

From the Equinix team:
"We do indeed use the 172.16/12 space internally, and that what you're seeing is currently expected when using our default L3 networking configuration. I would recommend adding some configuration to your systems routing to direct requests to the 172.16/12 space down the path you intend"

@glazychev-art glazychev-art self-assigned this Nov 15, 2022
@denis-tingaikin denis-tingaikin moved this to In Progress in Release v1.7.0 Nov 21, 2022
@glazychev-art glazychev-art moved this from In Progress to Under Review in Release v1.7.0 Nov 24, 2022
@glazychev-art glazychev-art moved this to Under review in Release v1.8.0 Feb 3, 2023
@denis-tingaikin denis-tingaikin moved this to Under review in Release v1.9.0 Mar 20, 2023
@denis-tingaikin denis-tingaikin moved this from Under review to Requested actions in Release v1.9.0 Mar 21, 2023
@glazychev-art glazychev-art moved this from Requested actions to Under review in Release v1.9.0 Mar 24, 2023
@denis-tingaikin denis-tingaikin moved this from Under review to Requested actions in Release v1.9.0 Apr 24, 2023
@denis-tingaikin denis-tingaikin moved this from Requested actions to Moved to next release in Release v1.9.0 May 2, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Moved to next release to Done in Release v1.9.0 May 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants