Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update NEXT-100 SiPM DB mapping #841

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jmbenlloch
Copy link
Contributor

@jmbenlloch jmbenlloch commented Oct 4, 2023

This PR updates the channel mapping according to the hardware connections made during the assembly at LSC.

The MC positions of the DBs are these:
image

The corresponding mapping of the "hardware ID" (FEB ID) for each DB goes like this:
image

Inside each DB, the corresponding mappings are these (ChannelID is the same as ElecID. The former is used in IC, while the latter is the name in the decoder):
image

To compute the ID of a sensor the following formula is used: (DB_ID + 1) * 1000 + sensor. For instance, the lower-left sensor of the first DB (lower-left as well) would be:

MC sensor ID: (0 + 1) * 1000 + 0 = 1000
Channel ID: (35 + 1) * 1000 + 13 = 36013

In the same way, SensorID 1001 corresponds to ChannelID 36012, etc.

This PR includes the new NEXT100 database with those relations for all 3584 SiPMs.

@jmbenlloch
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have updated this PR with a new mapping that includes the changes detected during the first tests at Canfranc.

The MC map is the same:

image

The new FEB ID map is this:

image

The internal mapping is the same as before.

Copy link
Collaborator

@halmamol halmamol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR updates the NEXT-100 database to match the channel mapping with the connections of the dices. These have been reviewed at LSC and with calibration runs.

@jwaiton jwaiton merged commit 9fb6f9b into next-exp:master Oct 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants