Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency eslint to v9 #783

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint (source) 8.55.0 -> 9.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.0.0

Compare Source

v8.57.0

Compare Source

Features

  • 1120b9b feat: Add loadESLint() API method for v8 (#​18098) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
  • dca7d0f feat: Enable eslint.config.mjs and eslint.config.cjs (#​18066) (Nitin Kumar)

Bug Fixes

  • 2196d97 fix: handle absolute file paths in FlatRuleTester (#​18064) (Nitin Kumar)
  • 69dd1d1 fix: Ensure config keys are printed for config errors (#​18067) (Nitin Kumar)
  • 9852a31 fix: deep merge behavior in flat config (#​18065) (Nitin Kumar)
  • 4c7e9b0 fix: allow circular references in config (#​18056) (Milos Djermanovic)

Documentation

Chores

v8.56.0

Compare Source

Features
  • 0dd9704 feat: Support custom severity when reporting unused disable directives (#​17212) (Bryan Mishkin)
  • 31a7e3f feat: fix no-restricted-properties false negatives with unknown objects (#​17818) (Arka Pratim Chaudhuri)
Bug Fixes
  • 7d5e5f6 fix: TypeError: fs.exists is not a function on read-only file system (#​17846) (Francesco Trotta)
  • 74739c8 fix: suggestion with invalid syntax in no-promise-executor-return rule (#​17812) (Bryan Mishkin)
Documentation
  • 9007719 docs: update link in ways-to-extend.md (#​17839) (Amel SELMANE)
  • 3a22236 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 54c3ca6 docs: fix migration-guide example (#​17829) (Tanuj Kanti)
  • 4391b71 docs: check config comments in rule examples (#​17815) (Francesco Trotta)
  • fd28363 docs: remove mention about ESLint stylistic rules in readme (#​17810) (Zwyx)
  • 48ed5a6 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
Chores

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 8, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8906552920

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.005%) to 97.421%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8491840663: 0.005%
Covered Lines: 395
Relevant Lines: 400

💛 - Coveralls

@stevenjoezhang stevenjoezhang added this to the 8.20.0 milestone Apr 8, 2024
@stevenjoezhang stevenjoezhang merged commit 4d69273 into master May 1, 2024
17 checks passed
@stevenjoezhang stevenjoezhang deleted the renovate/eslint-9.x branch May 1, 2024 07:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants