Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up HTML response #4016

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2020

Conversation

ChristophWurst
Copy link
Member

@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst commented Nov 6, 2020

Follow-up cleanup for #3904.

I think Psalm won't like that we use an unknown class. suppressed. There currently is no public API for the nonce.

@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst added this to the v1.7 milestone Nov 6, 2020
@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst requested a review from st3iny November 6, 2020 13:49
@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst self-assigned this Nov 6, 2020
@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst force-pushed the techdept/clean-up-html-response-constructor branch from ee03ee0 to b735814 Compare November 6, 2020 13:51
Copy link
Member

@st3iny st3iny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good (very elegant) and still works fine. But what about the static code checks failing?

Signed-off-by: Christoph Wurst <christoph@winzerhof-wurst.at>
@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst force-pushed the techdept/clean-up-html-response-constructor branch from 53793f9 to 217bac0 Compare November 6, 2020 14:47
@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Member Author

But what about the static code checks failing?

Fixed. Had to tell Psalm that we use a class that it can't find.

@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst merged commit 5b4319f into master Nov 6, 2020
@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst deleted the techdept/clean-up-html-response-constructor branch November 6, 2020 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants