-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Show previews from subfolders if folder doesn't contains any images #489
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
You do get images as preview on folders. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
You're right, this is slightly different. |
That might work for me. I run a whole lot of events and also contain personal pictures in many different folders/subfolders, etc, with a complex (but organised) folder tree structure. So having this behaviour really helps me rapidly drill down to where I want to go. Also, not sure if this is relevant, but in the past I relied on the periodic preview generation cron job to make it so the previews were generally available for me by the time I went to use them. I do appreciate you trying to work with me on clarifying what I'm seeking here. :) I don't exactly want to roll all the hard work back, but the previous behaviour really worked so well for me, and from what I've heard, others too. |
When using the folder view, the folders that doesn't contain images are showed blank with the folder icon. They should show the folder's subfolder's images if possible
Old description (Click to expand)
Can't remember which version the change happened, but I really miss the old per-folder gallery method, instead of everything strewn together in one big list of pictures. It's really disorganised and painful to use now. I really want to see the old structure style as an option (or by default), not just how it is now. It was really annoying the change was done without considering how well the previous method worked.Can we please get this as an option?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: