Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Block viewer loop on timeline #501

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2020

Conversation

Mikescops
Copy link
Member

On timeline going from first picture to last was not ideal as there is infinite scroll, so it was going to the last already loaded picture.

Also this feels not natural to loop over a timeline.

@Mikescops Mikescops added 3. to review Waiting for reviews design Related to the design labels Oct 19, 2020
@Mikescops Mikescops self-assigned this Oct 19, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jancborchardt jancborchardt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 design-wise. However on testing the branch, I can still loop around, and the "previous" button is still shown for the most recent picture? (Even after multiple force refreshes.)

@Mikescops
Copy link
Member Author

@jancborchardt do you have the latest viewer version?

@Mikescops
Copy link
Member Author

Signed-off-by: Corentin Mors <corentin.mors@dashlane.com>
@Mikescops Mikescops force-pushed the feature/block-viewer-loop-on-timeline branch from 55271a8 to df6db0e Compare October 22, 2020 14:29
@Mikescops Mikescops merged commit a1eabd0 into master Oct 22, 2020
@Mikescops Mikescops deleted the feature/block-viewer-loop-on-timeline branch October 22, 2020 14:31
@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member

@jancborchardt do you have the latest viewer version?

That was the issue of course, always forgetting about cross-app dependencies. :) Nice work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review Waiting for reviews design Related to the design
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants