Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bulk Upload Issues #29702

Open
2 tasks
mgallien opened this issue Nov 15, 2021 · 6 comments
Open
2 tasks

Bulk Upload Issues #29702

mgallien opened this issue Nov 15, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
0. Needs triage Pending check for reproducibility or if it fits our roadmap feature: dav overview

Comments

@mgallien
Copy link
Contributor

mgallien commented Nov 15, 2021

When implementing the client side of the new bulk upload protocol I found a few issues with it:

  • The type of checksum is enforced to be MD5 only. Would be nice to get the usual mechanism when server announces what is supported and desktop client then indicate the chosen type;
  • The error reporting is missing details (with plain WebDAV it is possible to get more details about error handling). I guess I will then force files in error to be uploaded via plain old WebDAV.

Reported issues:

Might have more later but apart from that works nicely.

@mgallien mgallien added bug 0. Needs triage Pending check for reproducibility or if it fits our roadmap labels Nov 15, 2021
@mgallien
Copy link
Contributor Author

@artonge sorry for the delay but as discussed a few small issues with bulk upload

@mgallien
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have another issue.
To speed up the upload I tried to send another request after sending the first one but before getting the reply of the first one.
Most of the time I get errors reported about locking issues.
It would really increase the speed if from desktop client perspective more than one request could be done at a time.

@eBug

This comment has been minimized.

@solracsf
Copy link
Member

Maybe also related: #31464

@szaimen

This comment was marked as outdated.

@brainchild0
Copy link

brainchild0 commented Sep 17, 2023

I would suggest the addition of #23615.

The issue has been closed, but I would characterize it as still unresolved, and as such, I feel it should remain open.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0. Needs triage Pending check for reproducibility or if it fits our roadmap feature: dav overview
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants