Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The MOLUSCE plugin predict the same area that the final map of Land Use #30

Open
FERCHEQU opened this issue May 7, 2019 · 13 comments
Open

Comments

@FERCHEQU
Copy link

FERCHEQU commented May 7, 2019

MOLUSCE creates the prediction map the same as the final land use map. I have land use maps for the year 2003 and 2010. The map of the simulation should be for the year 2017.

@ilchofre
Copy link

ilchofre commented Jun 19, 2019

Hello FERCHEQU,
the same happens to me when I try to get a simulated map using the Multi Criteria Evaluation Method. I use an initial land use map from 2007 and a final map from 2010, and the simulated map that I get for 2013 (1 iteration) is exactly the same that the one I have for 2010.
Have you managed to solve anything?
Thank you

@im-faisal
Copy link

I am also having the same issue. If you already have solved the problem, please help me out. Thanks in advance

@nkudemma
Copy link

nkudemma commented Nov 5, 2024

Hello MOLUSCE users, ,
I am having the same problem with that provided above, but, I do not find the answer to it. I use an initial land use map from 2015 and a final map from 2020, and the simulated map that I get for 2030 (1 iteration) is exactly the same as the one I have for 2020
Have you managed to solve anything? How to overcome this problem?
Thank you

@eduard-kazakov
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, that means that your model is inconfident about any particular changes. Could you share "Transition Potential Modelling" tab screenshot with learned model info?

@nkudemma
Copy link

nkudemma commented Nov 5, 2024 via email

@eduard-kazakov
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! Unfortunately I can't see any attachments, maybe because you sent them via email. Could you please try to attach them directly at GitHub?

@nkudemma
Copy link

nkudemma commented Nov 6, 2024

MOLUSCE_Problem.docx
Find the attachment of the problem with my MOLUSCE project

@eduard-kazakov
Copy link
Contributor

Try to increase number of samples several times, or switch to "All" mode.
Maximum iterations could be decreased in the same time

@nkudemma
Copy link

nkudemma commented Nov 6, 2024 via email

@eduard-kazakov
Copy link
Contributor

@nkudemma
Copy link

nkudemma commented Nov 6, 2024 via email

@nkudemma
Copy link

nkudemma commented Nov 6, 2024

MOLUSCE_Problem.docx
Dear Eduard,
Can you help to understand that error and propose a solution for it?
As you proposed, I shifted to "all" with 1000 samples.
Unfortunately, it did not work, there was an error attached for your reference.

Best regards,

Emmanuel

@eduard-kazakov
Copy link
Contributor

Dear Emmanuel,
it's hard to say. Could you please send your input data (LULC and spatial variables) to ee.kazakov@gmail.com, I'll try to reproduce.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants