Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update PSMN configuration to keep up with cluster changes #788

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

l-modolo
Copy link
Contributor

@l-modolo l-modolo commented Nov 5, 2024


name: psmn
about: update PSMN configuration to keep up with cluster changes

conf/psmn.config Outdated
Comment on lines 16 to 20
resourceLimits = [
memory: 370.GB,
cpus: 32,
time: 96.h
]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this removal intended? Seems like you'd want to keep resourceLimits around.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using clusterOptions to select partition is not wrong, but one could consider queue instead to manage those needing to override clusterOptions.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, I missed that - yes the resource limits definitely should be included!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the comment, so I can replace :

clusterOptions = "--partition=E5,Lake"

by :

queue = "E5,Lake"

with slurm ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.

@l-modolo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello,

I applied all the recommended modifications, please tell me if there is anything else I should modify.

Best,

@jfy133 jfy133 self-requested a review November 13, 2024 12:35
@jfy133
Copy link
Member

jfy133 commented Nov 13, 2024

You're good to merge @l-modolo !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants