Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New structure of mhc binding subworkflow #210

Merged

Conversation

alina-bauer
Copy link
Contributor

@alina-bauer alina-bauer commented Aug 29, 2023

Update general structure of MHCbinding subworkflow according to this flowchart.
This is just the bare minimum structure without the prediction functionality.

  • We started with the mhc binding subworflow only for the peptide input type and only for the single input type (implementation for all kinds of inputs will follow)
  • The nf core modules for the new subworkflow were added, the functionality will be implemented in the py files corresponding to the modules or in the modules itself
  • The mhc binding subworkflow as separate workflows
  • The pipeline runs through without functionality --with-stub
  • The threshold handling will happen in the prepare_prediction_input step

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/epitopeprediction branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 29, 2023

nf-core lint overall result: Passed ✅

Posted for pipeline commit 3839013

+| ✅ 159 tests passed       |+

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 2.9
  • Run at 2023-09-19 11:26:48

…ation of mhc binding for peptides without functionality, runs through with stub
@alina-bauer alina-bauer changed the base branch from dev to mhc-binding-subworkflow August 30, 2023 09:24
@alina-bauer alina-bauer changed the title Change nomenclature in samplesheet to inputtype New structure of mhc binding subworkflow Aug 30, 2023
modules/local/merge_predictions.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/mhcnuggets.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/merge_predictions.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/merge_predictions.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/mhcflurry.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/prepare_prediction_input.nf Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/syfpeithi.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/syfpeithi.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/syfpeithi.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
subworkflows/local/mhc_binding_prediction.nf Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@jonasscheid jonasscheid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll take care of netmhc stuff, but looks good, after fixing small suggestions

modules/local/mhcflurry.nf Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/netmhciipan.nf Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/local/netmhcpan.nf Show resolved Hide resolved
workflows/epitopeprediction.nf Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@jonasscheid jonasscheid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if tests run through locally with stub LGTM

@jonasscheid jonasscheid merged commit a32a890 into nf-core:mhc-binding-subworkflow Sep 19, 2023
7 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants